About Us
About Neropat
At Neropat IP, we focus on high-precision intellectual property analysis, with particular depth in patent invalidation, opposition support, and structured prior art investigations. Our work is grounded in technical rigor, evidentiary integrity, and strategic clarity.
We assist technology companies, litigation teams, patent challengers, and IP professionals in evaluating the strength, vulnerability, and enforceability of patent rights. Our approach goes beyond conventional searches – we conduct element-wise claim deconstruction, verbatim prior art mapping, and structured anticipation and obviousness assessments designed to withstand scrutiny.
While we provide a full spectrum of IP advisory services, we are particularly engaged in complex and high-value matters where analytical depth and disciplined methodology are essential. Each engagement is approached with careful technical immersion and strategic oversight. At Neropat IP, we do not operate as a high-volume processing firm. We work selectively, prioritizing precision, confidentiality, and substance over scale. Our commitment is not merely to deliver reports – but to provide defensible, well-reasoned positions that support informed decision-making in contentious and commercially significant environments.
About the Founder
Ms. Neha Sharma specializes in structured patent invalidation and inventive step analysis across major jurisdictions. Her work centers on dissecting claim architecture, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and developing defensible multi-reference reasoning aligned with jurisdiction-specific standards.
She regularly supports boutique IP firms and international associates in matters involving element-wise claim evaluation, multi-reference combination strategy, and software and electronics patent vulnerability assessment. Her analysis integrates technical reasoning with jurisdiction-aware inventive step framing across U.S., European, Indian, and PCT portfolios.
Neha approaches patent evaluation as a disciplined reasoning exercise rather than a keyword-driven search process. Each engagement involves detailed claim architecture assessment, technical element clustering, combination viability analysis, and structured enforcement risk positioning.
Her objective is to deliver clear, defensible, and strategically grounded patent intelligence capable of withstanding scrutiny in complex and contentious environments.